Delegation of the European Union to Australia

The EU joins Australia, New Zealand & 10 other countries to call for Japan to end lethal research whaling

19/12/2017 - 00:21
News stories

The EU joins call for Japan to end lethal research whaling. The EU reaffirms its opposition to commercial whaling and its support to the global moratorium on whaling in place for over 30 years

The EU has decided to support a statement initiated by Australia and supported by many other countries, which opposes Japan scientific whaling in accordance with the EU line on whaling and in the context of the International Whaling Commission (IWC). The statement has been coordinated within the European Commission and among Member States within the European Council.

All whale species and other cetaceans are protected from deliberate disturbance, capture or killing within EU waters. The EU legislation prohibits the keeping, transport and sale or exchange, of specimens taken from the wild and bans the introduction of cetaceans into the Union for primarily commercial purposes. It also contributes to improve the quality of the environment for whales and other cetaceans by promoting the  good environmental status of the EU oceans and seas.

dolphinHowever, due to the migratory character of whale populations, EU policy can not be effective within EU waters if it is not backed by coherent worldwide action under a comparable international regulatory framework.

That framework is provided by the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW) signed in 1946 which stresses both the conservation and management of whale populations at global level. The competent body governing the implementation of the Convention is the International Whaling Commission (IWC). As the Convention pre-dates the Treaty of Rome, membership is restricted to Governments and therefore the European Union only has observer status in the IWC. Currently, twenty-five EU Member States are Contracting Governments to the ICRW which counts eighty seven Contracting Governments in total.

The IWC regulates commercial whaling and decided in 1982 that there should be a moratorium on commercial whaling on all whale species and populations from 1986 onwards. The EU has always supported the maintenance and full implementation of the moratorium against leading whaling States which have consistently contested it and still carry out whaling for what they call "scientific" purposes or under other exceptions. This polarisation between 'pro- whaling' States only some of whom are engaged in whaling activities, and 'anti-whaling' ones focused on strict conservation remains entrenched.

Nevertheless, over time, the IWC has become the international organisation of reference for all aspects related to whales and whaling, undertaking activities such as field research programmes, population modelling, conservation plans, threats knowledge and management. The IWC works on the basis of a Strategic Plan which identifies priority threats to cetaceans (ship strikes, marine debris, bycatch, anthropogenic sound, chemical pollution and climate change) as well as priority actions (sustainable whale watching, conservation management plans, sanctuaries, data collection and reporting). In addition, a new emphasis has been put on the contribution of whales and other cetaceans to regulating ecosystems and providing ecosystem services. As part of its strong policy commitment to conservation, the EU supports IWC proposals for Whale Sanctuaries and for improved welfare of whales.

Another fundamental and integral part of the duties performed by the IWC is the regulation of Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling (ASW), i.e. the hunting of whales carried out by indigenous communities who have a tradition of whaling and hunt whales for their subsistence. ASW is not subject to the moratorium as it is not commercial whaling. The IWC sets ASW catch limits every six years. It is the responsibility of governments to provide evidence of the needs of their indigenous people in the form of a "needs statement" which details the cultural, subsistence and nutritional aspects of the hunt, products and distribution. The IWC decides catch limits, taking into account the needs statement and the IWC Scientific Committee opinion. ASW has often been a contentious issue, both at EU and IWC level but the EU as a whole and Denmark on behalf of Greenland took important initiatives to defuse tensions over ASW, putting the emphasis on regulating ASW through a more consistent and long-term approach.

In relation to all this IWC's work, the EU is guided by its overarching objective, which is to ensure an effective international regulatory framework for the conservation and management of whales guaranteeing a significant improvement in the conservation status of whales and bringing all whaling operations by IWC members under IWC control.

Editorial Sections: